Revdoku vs Harvis.dev
Revdoku is an active AI-first static publishing service with public pricing and limits. Harvis.dev has been described as a zero-config CLI host using npx harvis, but its official website and current documentation were not retrievable during this review on August 15, 2026.
The table separates Revdoku’s documented features from previously published Harvis.dev descriptions. Verify Harvis.dev directly before relying on it for a new project.
Quick comparison
| Capability | Revdoku | Harvis.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Current official documentation | Available | Could not be retrieved during this review |
| Reported focus | AI-published static websites and files | Zero-config CLI static hosting |
| First publish | Browser sign-in, private draft, then explicit publish | Previously described as npx harvis |
| Free permanent sites | Included within the current published plan limits | Current limit not verified |
| Custom domain | Follow the current Revdoku pricing contract | Current support not verified |
| Forms | Plan-specific monthly or daily submission limits | Previously described as free form collection |
| GitHub Actions | GitHub sync is included on plans that provide it | Previously described as integrated |
| SSL and delivery | HTTPS localhost3000.love URL with a revdoku.site alias |
Previously described as SSL via Cloudflare CDN |
| Free analytics | Basic website analytics included | Current availability not verified |
Choose Revdoku when
Choose Revdoku when you need published limits, private drafts, 15-minute review previews, permanent sites on Free, and a workflow designed for ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, or another supported AI client.
Consider Harvis.dev when
Consider Harvis.dev only after confirming that the CLI, service, forms, and domain features are still available. A short CLI command can be attractive, but unavailable documentation makes current limits and support difficult to assess.
Key difference
Revdoku’s current product and quotas are documented. Harvis.dev’s previously circulated feature summary could not be independently confirmed, so it would be misleading to present the two as equally verified.
Sources checked
Compare more website hosting options.