Revdoku vs here.now

Revdoku and here.now both turn a folder of static files into a live website. The main difference is the account and agent workflow: Revdoku starts with browser sign-in and offers a local client plus a hosted OAuth MCP server, while here.now documents an anonymous preview, skill, and API workflow.

This comparison uses the public Revdoku and here.now documentation checked on August 14, 2026. Limits and interfaces can change, so verify the linked documentation before choosing a host for an important project.

Quick comparison

Capability Revdoku here.now
First publish Browser sign-in, private draft, then explicit publish Public 24-hour preview
Permanent website Included with a Free account Sign in and keep the site on a free account
Free account limits Published in Revdoku’s live pricing contract 10 GB total and up to 500 sites
Update the same URL Yes, by reusing the website or bound folder Yes, by updating the existing site
Password access Supported Supported
Email-based access Require Email access is supported Restricted access is documented
Analytics in the free account Basic analytics Not included
Custom domain Plan-driven One domain in the free account
Agent connections Local client, AI skill, hosted MCP with OAuth, HTTP API AI skill and HTTP API
Static hosting Yes Yes

Choose Revdoku when

  • Your agent connects through a hosted MCP server with browser-based OAuth.
  • You want the same website available to Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, OpenClaw, and other compatible clients.
  • You need Public, Password, or Require Email access.
  • You want to publish a local folder with binary assets through a dedicated client.
  • You want a private draft and temporary preview before publishing.

Choose here.now when

  • Its larger documented free storage or site count is the deciding factor.
  • You already use its publishing skill or API.
  • You want its documented site workflow and do not need Revdoku’s hosted MCP connection.

Same-URL update workflow in Revdoku

  1. Sign in and preview a folder with revdoku preview path/to/site.
  2. Review the temporary URL, then publish with revdoku p path/to/site.
  3. Save the returned main website URL.
  4. Edit the original folder.
  5. Publish that bound folder again.
  6. Reload the original URL and verify the update.

For AI-client setup, see the Revdoku MCP website-publishing guide.

Bottom line

Both services are designed for fast static publishing. Revdoku is the stronger fit when authenticated private drafts, access controls, and a hosted multi-client MCP workflow matter more.

Markdown version
Loading PDF…